Danzig Ltd. et al v. Inception Mining Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Carlos E. Duque for Brett Bertolami and for Danzig Ltd.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/13/17. (tob)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-00018-RLV-DSC
DANZIG LTD. AND BRETT
BERTOLAMI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
INCEPTION MINING INC., MICHAEL
AHLIN AND TRENT D'AMBROSIO,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice [of
Carlos E. Duque]” (document # 12) filed May 12, 2017.
Mr. Duque signed Plaintiff’s Complaint (document #1) electronically on January 19, 2017
with the notation “(Pro hav [sic] vice forthcoming).” However, no pro hac vice Motion was
forthcoming until almost four months later. In the meantime, Mr. Duque filed a Motion to
disqualify Defendants’ counsel (document #8) on April 28, 2017 again signing with the notation
“(pro hac vice forthcoming).” In a footnote to his brief in support of the Motion to disqualify
Defendants’ counsel, Mr. Duque noted that Ms. Polich made an appearance on April 14, 2017 but
“has not yet filed a motion for leave to appear before this Court on a pro hac vice basis.” At that
point, neither had Mr. Duque. He finally filed his Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (document
#12) on May 12, 2017. The Court will grant Mr. Duque’s Motion. However, he is cautioned to
read the Local Rules and ensure that he complies with them as well as the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure in the future. Any further violations may result in the imposition of appropriate
sanctions.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties, including but
not limited to moving counsel; and to the Honorable Richard L. Voorhees.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: June 13, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?