Fraley v. Doe et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 20 Motion to Have Evidence Added. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/17/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
5:17-cv-75-FDW
SHAWN GERMAINE FRALEY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
JOHN DOE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Third Motion to Appoint Counsel,
(Doc. No. 19), and on Plaintiff’s Motion to Have Evidence Added to Case, (Doc. No. 20).
First, as to Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, his motion is denied for the same
reasons this Court denied his prior motions to appoint counsel.
Next, to the extent that Plaintiff states, in his “Motion to Have Evidence Added to Case,”
that he seeks to obtain certain discovery from Defendants, including videotape footage, the Court
advises Plaintiff that he will be entitled to seek discovery from Defendants once this Court enters
a case management order and discovery commences. The Court will enter such order when
Defendants have answered or otherwise responded to the Complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Third Motion to Appoint Counsel,
(Doc. No. 19), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Have Evidence Added to Case, (Doc. No. 20), are both
DENIED.

Signed: August 17, 2017

1