Stoker v. Berryhill

Filing 9

ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment and at the same time file brief in support pursuant to Local Civil Rule Procedure 7.1(A). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 12/12/2017. (tmg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
5:17 CV 111
TIMOTHY CURTIS STOKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

On December 11, 2017, Plaintiff Timothy Stoker filed a Brief in Support of
Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, however, did not file a motion with the Court. Regarding
motions, Local Civil Rule of Procedure 7.1(A) states:
(A) Motions in Writing. Unless made during a hearing or trial, all motions
must be put in writing and filed as provide by LCvR 5.2(C) and shall state
with particularity the grounds of the motions and shall set forth the relief or
Order sought. Motions will ordinarily be ruled upon without oral argument,
unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
Regarding briefs in support of motions, Local Civil Rule of Procedure 7.1(C) states:
(C) Requirement of Briefs. Briefs shall be filed contemporaneously with
the motion. . . .
Therefore, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary
Judgment and at that same time file his brief in support.
Signed: December 12, 2017