Hamby v. Berryhill

Filing 17

ORDER granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees under EAJA. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/18/2018. (tmg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 5:17-cv-00139-FDW TONY HAMBY, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) Acting ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Consent Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 16). In the motion and proposed order attached thereto (Doc. No. 16-3), Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,500.00 for attorney fees in full and final settlement of all claims for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Consent Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED. The Commissioner of Social Security shall pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,500.00, sent to Plaintiff’s counsel’s office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: April 18, 2018 CONSENTED TO: /s/ CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar # 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 charlotte@charleshallfirm.com /s/ PETER A. HEINLEIN Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Room 646, Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: (410) 965-2350 Fax: (410) 597-0137 Peter.Heinlein@ssa.gov Maryland Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?