Hamby v. Berryhill
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees under EAJA. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/18/2018. (tmg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 5:17-cv-00139-FDW
TONY HAMBY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY
A.
BERRYHILL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
Acting )
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Consent Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc.
No. 16). In the motion and proposed order attached thereto (Doc. No. 16-3), Plaintiff, by and
through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent
Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the
parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,500.00 for
attorney fees in full and final settlement of all claims for attorney fees arising under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Consent Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 16) is
GRANTED. The Commissioner of Social Security shall pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,500.00,
sent to Plaintiff’s counsel’s office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under
the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 18, 2018
CONSENTED TO:
/s/ CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/ PETER A. HEINLEIN
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Room 646, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (410) 965-2350
Fax: (410) 597-0137
Peter.Heinlein@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?