Bilotta v. Berryhill
ORDER granting 30 Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (EAJA). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/7/2021. (mek)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
CIVIL NO. 5:18-CV-00121-FDW-DSC
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Plaintiff’s Consent
Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d)(1)(A) (EAJA), filed on June 7, 2021.
Having reviewed the Motion,
supporting materials, memorandum in support, and the case file, and noting
Defendant’s consent, the Court determines that Plaintiff should be awarded an
attorney’s fee under the EAJA in the amount of $20,000.00.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees Under the EAJA is
GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney’s fees in the amount of
$20,000.00, and that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. --, 130 S.
Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may
owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes
a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds
remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If
the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the
Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government will exercise its discretion and
honor an assignment of EAJA fees and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff’s
counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.
Signed: June 7, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?