Pitman v. Vogel Law Firm et al
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 29 Stipulation. Pretrial deadlines shall be amended as follows. Discovery due by 8/15/2013. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 9/1/2013. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 10/1/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 12/15/2013. The court shall conduct a Mid-Discovery Status Conference on 6/17/2013 at 10:00 AM by telephone. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
David Pittman,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Vogel Law Firm and John Brakke,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION
TO AMEND SCHEDULING/
DISCOVERY PLAN
Case No. 1:12-cv-103
On March 14, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation to Amend Scheduling/Discovery Plan. The
court ADOPTS the parties’ stipulation (Docket No. 29). The Scheduling/Discovery Plan shall be
amended as follows:
3.
The parties shall have until August 15, 2013, to complete fact discovery and to file
discovery motions.
4.
The parties shall provide the names of expert witnesses and complete reports under
Rule 26(a)(2) as follows: Plaintiff shall have until September 1, 2013, and defendants
shall have until October 1, 2013, to identify the subject matter/discipline of expert
witnesses to be used at trial.
5.
The parties shall have until November 15, 2013, to complete discovery depositions
of expert witnesses.
10.
The parties shall have until December 15, 2013, to file other dispositive motions
(summary judgment as to all or part of the case).
In accordance with the parties’ request, the court shall also schedule a schedule a mid-discovery
1
status conference for Monday, June 17, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. The conference shall be held by
telephone conference call to be initiated by the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 18th day of March, 2013.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?