Fernandez v. State of North Dakota
Filing
162
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 159 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; granting 160 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply; denying 160 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff's reply in support of his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and sur-reply to defendants' reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment are due by 4/28/2014. Defendant's response to sur-reply is due by 5/9/2014. (BG) Distributed on 4/4/2014 (jt).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Kevin Fernandez,
Plaintiff,
vs.
State of North Dakota, et. al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No. 1:12-cv-161
On April 4, 2014, plaintiff filed: (1) a Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Plaintiff’s
Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and (2)
Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Response to Defendant’s Reply Memorandum or
Alternatively, Motion to Strike.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 159) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff shall have until April 28, 2014, to file a reply not to exceed 10 pages. D.N.D. Civ. L.R.
7.1(A)(1).
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Docket No. 160) is DENIED. His Motion for Leave to File a
Sur-Reply in Response to Defendant’s Reply Memorandum (Docket No. 160) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff shall have until April 28, 2014 to file a sur-reply not to exceed 5 pages. Defendants shall
have until May 9, 2014, to file response to plaintiff’s sur-reply not to exceed 5 pages.
1
The parties are advised that requests for additional time and for leave to exceed the
aforementioned page limitations will not be looked upon favorably.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 4th day of April, 2014.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?