Multi-Chem Group, LLC v. 3Chem, LLC et al
Filing
93
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Multi-Chem Group, LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
3Chem, LLC, Tim Gabel, Pam Klabo, and
Shane Sowatzki,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 1:13-cv-006
Pursuant to the court’s separate memorandum opinion and order of this same date, it is
hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. As used in this Protective Order, the following terms shall have the following meaning
unless the context clearly provides otherwise:
a.
“Protected Material” means all documents, testimony, or other information
that have been marked or designated as being Protected Material in the
manner provided for by this Protective Order, including copies or other
reproductions of any material so marked or designated.
b.
“Party” or “parties” shall include the employees, agents, successors, assigns,
and attorneys of the party or parties named in this lawsuit
c.
“Termination of the Litigation” shall mean the entry of final, non-appealable
dismissal or judgment.
2. Any party may mark or designate as Confidential or Protected Material any documents,
testimony, or other information produced or generated during this litigation that the party in good
1
faith reasonably believes is properly the subject of a protective order under the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure because it contains: (i) trade secrets, proprietary information, or commercially
sensitive information the dissemination of which has a significant likelihood of damaging the party’s
business position in the marketplace; or (ii) personal information the disclosure of which would
constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
3. Any party may challenge a designation of Protected Material by filing a motion with the
court, but only after first attempting to resolve the matter with the other parties. The party claiming
the benefit of the designation of Protected Material shall have the burden of persuasion.
4. Except as otherwise provided herein, Protected Material that has been marked or
designated by a party in accordance with this Protective Order may only be used by the other parties
for purposes of this litigation and no other circumstances. The other parties shall keep the Protected
Material confidential, except that access to the Protected Material may be given as follows:
a.
To personnel who are directly employed by counsel of record for the other
parties, provided that they maintain the confidentiality of the Protected
Material and that counsel of record shall be responsible for their compliance
with this Protective Order.
b.
To experts or consultants retained for purposes of the litigation subject to the
requirements of paragraph 5 of the Protective Order.
c.
To witnesses and prospective witnesses, but only to the extent necessary for
their testimony or the preparation for their testimony.
d.
To the court, its staff, and to any privately engaged stenographic reporters.
5. The following applies to the Protected Material disclosed to experts and consultants
2
pursuant to this Protective Order:
a.
No Protected Material may be disclosed to an expert or consultant until that
person has been provided with a copy of the Protective Order, the person has
agreed to be bound by its provisions, and the person has acknowledged his
or her agreement in writing. Counsel providing access to the Protected
Material shall maintain a list of names of all experts and consultants to whom
the Protected Material has been provided as well as copies of the written
acknowledgments signed by the experts or consultants.
b.
Experts and consultants who have been provided access to Protected Material
shall use the Protected Material only for the purposes of this litigation and
not for any other purpose.
c.
Any expert or consultant who has been provided Protected Material pursuant
to this Protective Order shall, not later than thirty (30) days following the
Termination of the Litigation in this action, (i) destroy the Protected Material
or return it to the party or its counsel who provided the expert or consultant
with the Protected Material and (ii) indicate to that party or its counsel that
the Protected Material has all been destroyed or returned.
6. If documents constituting Protected Material are used during a deposition, they will be
marked as exhibits or otherwise referred to with enough specificity so that they can later be easily
identified, and, if marked as deposition exhibits, the original exhibits will be sealed with the original
deposition transcript. If a party desires to claim information discussed during a deposition as
Protected Material, counsel for the party may designate the appropriate portions of the deposition
3
transcript by page and line number as Protected Material provided that counsel does so within thirty
(30) days following receipt of the deposition transcript and serves the designation upon counsel for
the other parties.
7. If a party desires to file any deposition testimony, deposition exhibit, discovery request
or response, affidavit, motion, brief, or other document that includes, incorporates, or quotes specific
Protected Material, it shall follow the court’s requirements and procedures for filing under seal
unless the court orders otherwise.
8. Any party desiring to use Protected Material during the trial must first seek permission
from the court. The sealing of a trial record or closure of trial proceedings involves a number of
considerations that are not presently before the court and will be dealt with at that time.
9. Inadvertent or unintentional production of Protected Material by a party claiming
confidentiality shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of that party’s claim of
confidentiality.
11. The party who has marked or designated specific documents or information as Protected
Material may agree, either in writing or verbally on the record during any deposition or court
proceeding, to declassify any such material, at which point it will no longer be deemed Protected
Material.
12. Any party or counsel who has been provided Protected Material marked or designated
by another party shall, no later than sixty (60) days following Termination of the Litigation in this
action, (i) destroy the Protected Material or return it to counsel for the party marking or designating
the Protected Material, and (ii) provide a letter to counsel for the party marking or designating the
Protected Material indicating that all of the Protected Material has been returned or destroyed.
4
13. Information provided by third persons or entities may be designated as “Protected
Material” by agreement of the parties or by court order and the provisions of this Protective Order
shall apply to such Protected Material as appropriate.
14. No party may designate material for attorney’s eyes only or similar designation (herein
“Attorney’s Eyes Only Material”) in the absence of the attorneys for the parties reaching an
agreement that the specific material in question shall be so designated unless the party obtains a
court order allowing for such a designation. The procedure to be followed in designating Attorney’s
Eyes Only Material shall be as follows:
a.
The party seeking to designate material for attorney’s eyes only shall submit
the material to the attorneys for the receiving parties who shall not disclose
the information to third persons, except for their staff, until the matter of the
designation has been agreed upon or the court orders the designation.
b.
The party seeking to designate the material for attorney’s eyes only shall seek
the agreement of the attorneys for the receiving parties as to the designation
of Attorney’s Eyes Only Material for each specific item submitted to the
attorneys for the receiving parties.
c.
If an agreement cannot be obtained, then the party seeking the designation
may move the court for relief as to those specific items where an agreement
could not be reached.
Where material has been designated Attorney’s Eyes Only Material either by agreement of
the attorneys for the parties or by court order, the following shall apply in the absence of a written
agreement between the attorneys for the parties or a court order to the contrary:
5
a.
The attorneys for the receiving party shall not disclose the Attorney’s Eyes
Only Material to the receiving party or to any other persons (including
retained experts and consultants) absent an agreement with the designating
party or a court order providing otherwise, except that the attorneys for the
receiving party may disclose the material to their staff (who must agree to
abide by the restrictions of the designation) or to the court under seal.
b.
Attorney’s Eyes Only Material shall not be used as evidence absent the
specific agreement of the attorneys for the parties or a court order.
c.
If any party wishes to use Attorney’s Eyes Only Material during a deposition
or at trial, the party shall discuss it with the other parties at least ten days
prior to the deposition or trial. If the parties are unable to agree in advance
of the deposition or trial to the use of the Attorney’s Eyes Only Material, the
parties are to immediately contact the supervising magistrate judge at least
two business days prior to the deposition or trial. Failure to abide by this
provision may result in the imposition of costs, including the costs of
rescheduling, retaking, or supplementing a deposition.
d.
The designating party may not disclose Attorney’s Eyes Only Material to
experts or consultants retained specifically for the purpose of this litigation
absent the specific agreement of the parties or a court order.
e.
Except as otherwise set forth above, the right of the designating party to use
Attorney’s Eyes Only Material is not restricted, but it may be grounds for the
court ordering that the material is not entitled to such a designation.
6
f.
Notwithstanding any prior agreement by a party or a court order, a party may
at any time move the court for a court order seeking to remove the Attorney’s
Eyes Only Material designation provided the party has first sought to resolve
the matter with the other parties. The party claiming the benefit of the
designation of Attorney’s Eyes Only Material shall have the burden of
persuasion.
15. The court retains jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Protective Order, the parties
to this action, and any persons and entities provided with Protected Material or Attorney’s Eyes
Only Material pursuant to this Protective Order, even after the entry of judgment in this action, to
hear any motions to resolve any disputes with respect to this Protective Order.
Dated this 7th day of August, 2013.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?