Flores v. United States Attorney General et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and DISMISSING the complaint with prejudice by Judge Daniel L. Hovland. (QF) Distributed on 5/20/2013 (jt).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION Eric Flores, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT vs. ) AND RECOMMENDATION ) United States Attorney General; ) Case No. 1:13-cv-039 United States Department of Health and ) Human Services; and Public Health Service ) named Sierra Medical Center, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ On April 1, 2013, Eric Flores filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and attached a proposed complaint. See Docket Nos. 1 and 1-1. Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. conducted an initial screening and issued a Report and Recommendation on April 29, 2013. See Docket No. 5. Judge Miller recommends the Court deny Flores’s motion and dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See Docket No. 5. In the proposed complaint, Flores alleges that federal government employees have directed transmissions from a satellite toward Mexican-Americans in order to alter their genetic code. Magistrate Judge Miller found Flores’s proposed complaint to be “clearly fanciful, fantastic, [and] delusional.” See Docket No. 5, p. 3. The Court agrees. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 5) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and Flores’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 1) is DENIED; and the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th day of May, 2013. /s/ Daniel L. Hovland Daniel L. Hovland, District Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?