Chapman et al v. Hiland Partners, LLC
Filing
168
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 164 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal; granting 166 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (KT)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Lenny M. Chapman and
Tracy M. Chapman,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Hiland Operating, LLC, a Foreign
Company, Hiland Partners GP Holdings,
LLC, a Foreign Company, and Hiland
Partners LP, a Foreign Partnership,
Defendants and
Third-Party Plaintiff
(Hiland Operating, LLC)
vs.
Missouri Basin Well Service, Inc., and
B&B Heavy Haul, LLC,
Third-Party Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL;
GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITIATIONS
Case No. 1:13-cv-052
Before the court are “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal” and
“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations” filed May 28, 2014. Plaintiffs seek leave
to file their memorandum in support of motion for leave to amend complaint to seek punitive
damages and an accompanying affidavit under seal because the documents contain information
defendants have designated as confidential. Plaintiffs also seek leave for that memorandum to
exceed the D.N.D. Civ. L.R. 7.1(B) 20-page limitation due to the complexity and fact-intensive
nature of the case.
For good cause shown, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
(Docket No. 164) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations (Docket No. 166).
Plaintiffs may file their memorandum in support of motion for leave to amend complaint to seek
punitive damages and the accompanying affidavit of David S. Maring under seal. The memorandum
may not exceed fifty (50) pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 29th day of May, 2014.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?