Arnegard Holdings, LLC et al v. Tri-State Consulting Engineers, Inc. et al
Filing
79
ORDER adopting 78 Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/29/2015. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 5/12/2015. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 6/10/2015. Other Nondispositive Motions due by 7/29/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 7/29/2015. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Arnegard Holdings, LLC,
Arnegard WW Holdings, LLC,
and Titanium Builders, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Tri-State Consulting Engineers, Inc.,
Steven W. Syrcle, Advanced Wastewater
Engineering, P.C., and George Miles,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION
TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
Case No. 1:13-cv-124
Before to court is a “Stipulated Second Amended Joint 26(f) Proposed Scheduling Plan” filed
on November 24, 2014. The court ADOPTS the stipulation (Docket No. 78) and ORDERS the
existing Scheduling Order AMENDED as follows:
1. The parties shall have until April 29, 2015 to complete fact discovery and to file
discovery motions.
2. The parties shall provide the names of expert witnesses and complete reports under Rule
26(a)(2) as follows:
1. Plaintiffs shall disclose experts and opinions no later than May 12, 2015.
2. Defendants shall disclose experts and opinions no later than June 10, 2015.
3. The parties shall have until June 30, 2015 to complete discovery depositions of expert
witnesses.
4. The parties shall have until July 29, 2015 to file other nondispositive motions.
5. The parties shall have until July 29, 2015 to file other dispositive motions (summary
1
judgment as to all or part of the case).
6. The parties shall be ready to evaluate the case for settlement purposes by April 29, 2015.
Dated this 26th day of November, 2014.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?