Mosser et al v. Denbury Resources, Inc. et al
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr denying 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ZE)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Randall Mosser, Douglas Mosser,
Marilyn Koon, and Jayne Harkin,
Denbury Resources, Inc. and
Denbury Onshore, LLC,
ORDER DENYING DENBURY’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Case No. 1:13-cv-148
Defendants Denbury Resources, Inc. and Denbury Onshore, LLC (collectively “Denbury”)
filed a motion for summary judgment on July 1, 2016. (Doc. No. 92). On October 6, 2016, the court
ruled against Denbury with respect to several of the arguments made in support of its motion and
reserved ruling on the remainder pending the possible certification of issues to the North Dakota
Supreme Court. (Doc. No. 108).
On November 18, 2016, the court certified seven questions to the North Dakota Supreme
Court of which that court answered six in a decision issued on July 12, 2017, and transmitted to and
filed in this court on the same date.
After careful review of the North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision, the court now finally
DENIES Denbury’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 92) for the reasons articulated by the
North Dakota Supreme Court as well as for the reasons expressed by this court in its October 6, 2016
partial ruling on the motion. In so ruling, the court concludes there are material disputed issues of
fact with respect to damages that must be resolved by a jury. Without making any ruling with
respect to the entirety of plaintiffs’ damages evidence, plaintiffs have proffered at least some
evidence of damages that the North Dakota Supreme Court has concluded is relevant under North
Dakota law with respect to the issue of “lost use of and access to” the pore space under N.D.C.C. §
38-11.1-04 and that otherwise appears at this point to facially be admissible.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 18th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?