Smith v. Hartman Walsh Industrial Services et al

Filing 163

ORDER ADOPTING 134 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 108 Motion for Injunctive Relief; and denying 125 Motion to Strike by Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Robert Charles Smith,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:15-cv-94

-vs-

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

Hartman Walsh Painting Company,
Basic Electric Power Cooperative, and
Sargent & Lundy, LLC,
Defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation
from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge.1 The Report and
Recommendation recommends that Defendant Hartman Walsh Painting Company’s
(“Hartman”) motion for injunctive relief2 be denied and that Defendant Hartman’s motion
to strike3 also be denied. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has
expired.
After reviewing the record and the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation,
the court finds the magistrate judge’s analysis of the motions and recommendations for
disposition are appropriate.

Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the Report and

Recommendation in its entirety. Defendant Hartman’s motion for injunctive relief and
motion to strike are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 7th day of December, 2016.
/s/ Ralph R. Erickson
Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge
United States District Court

1

Doc. #134.

2

Doc. #108.

3

Doc. #125.