Whatley v. Canadian Pacific Railway Limited et al

Filing 62

ORDER setting briefing scheduling for motion to stay discovery, staying discovery in the interim, and extending plaintiff's deadline for responding to motion for judgment on pleadings/summary judgment. Motion to stay discovery due by 12/08/2016. Response and reply are due by 12/29/2016 and 1/6/2017, respectively. Plaintiff's response to motion for judgment on pleadings/summary judgment due by 12/20/2016. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Joe R. Whatley, Jr. solely in his capacity
as the WD Trustee of the WD Trust,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited,
Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
Soo Line Corporation, and Soo Line
Railroad Company,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

Case No. 1:16-cv-074

The court held a status conference with the parties by telephone on November 28, 2016.
Pursuant to its discussion with the parties, court ORDERS that defendants shall have until
December 8, 2016, to file a motion to stay discovery. The court further ORDERS that plaintiff’s
response and defendants’ reply to the motion to stay discovery are due by December 29, 2016, and
January 6, 2017, respectively. All discovery shall be stayed until the court rules on the motion.
Finally, the court ORDERS that plaintiff shall have until December 20, 2016, to file a
response to defendants’ threshold motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, for
summary judgment.”
Dated this 28th day of November, 2016.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court