Western Energy Alliance et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
Filing
30
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 28 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Laurence Michael Bogert. (BG) Regenerated to Attorney Laurence Michael Bogert on 7/15/2016. (rh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Western Energy Alliance and North
Dakota Petroleum Council,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Sally
Jewell, in her official capacity as
Secretary, Bureau of Land Management,
part of the U.S. Department of Interior,
Neil Knornze, in his official capacity as
Director of the Bureau of Land
Management, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, in his official
capacity as Secretary, U.S. Forest Service,
a party of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, in his
official capacity as Chief, U.S. Forest
Service,
Defendants.
Before the court
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER RE ADMISSION
PRO HAC VICE
Case No. 1:16-cv-112
attorney Laurence Michael Bogert ato appear pro hac vice
on behalf of
, State of Utah, and State Institutional Trust
Lands Administration. In accordance with D.N.D. Gen. L.R. 1.3(D), attorney Laurence Michael
Bogert
affirmed to submit to the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the
District of North Dakota and to the jurisdiction of this court in matters of discipline.
lso
paid the required admission fees to the office of the Clerk. Accordingly, the motion (Docket
No. 28)
GRANTED. Attorney Laurence Michael Bogert
admitted to practice before this
court in the above-entitled action on behalf of Amicus Curiae Governor Gary R. Herbert, State of
Utah, and State Institutional Trust Lands Administration
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 1 th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?