Peterson v. City of Minot et al

Filing 133

ORDER: Defendants are authorized to fully communicate with their expert about the matters that were the subject of his forensic examination and report. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Joshua Peterson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) City of Minot, a Political Subdivision, and ) Officer Brandon Schmitt, a Minot Police ) Officer, in his individual capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Case No. 1:16-cv-271 The court previously issued an amended order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to compel. Therein it placed certain restrictions on communications regarding the defendant’s expert’s forensic examination and report. Pursuant to a request from defendants, the court authorizes defendants to fully communicate with their expert about the matters that were the subject of his forensic examination and report. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 21st day of March, 2019. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?