Nadeau v. Shipman et al

Filing 35

AMENDED ORDER granting 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Defendants David Shipman and Morton County shall have until January 5, 2018, to supplement their response to plaintiffs motion to strike. Plaintiff shall have until January 26, 2018, to supplement her reply. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(BG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Diana Nadeau, individually and on
behalf of the next-of-kin of John Nadeau,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
David Shipman, in his individual and official
capacities as Morton County Sheriff, Deborah
Addy, in her individual capacity, Boyd Addy
in his individual capacity, Tina George, in her
individual capacity, John Does 1-2, in their
individual capacities as Morton County
correctional officers, John Does 3-4, in their
individual capacities as Morton County
Correctional Center medical staff: and Morton
County,
Defendants.

ORDER

Case No. 1:17-cv-074

On July 17, 2017, plaintiff filed a “Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses of
Defendants David Shipman and Morton County.” On September 31, 2017, the court held a
scheduling conference with the parties by telephone. Pursuant to its discussions with the parties
during the conference, the court issued an order in which it: (1) advised it was construing plaintiff’s
motion to strike as a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and (2) established deadlines of
September 1 and 21, 2017, for the parties to file their respective response and reply.
On September 1, 2017, defendants David Shipman and Morton County filed a “Rule 56(d)
Motion for Time to Conduct Additional Discovery on Defenses.” Additionally, they filed a
combined memorandum in response to plaintiff’s motion to strike and in support of their motion for
additional time. Therein, they asserted that they require time to conduct additional discovery in

1

order to fully respond to plaintiff’s motion.
Plaintiff filed a reply in support of her motion to strike on September 20, 2017. Therein they
aver that defendants request for additional time is misplaced as no amount of discovery is going to
assistant defendants.
Given the present posture of this case, an extension as proposed poses no appreciable
prejudice to plaintiff. Accordingly, defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED. Defendants
David Shipman and Morton County shall have until January 5, 2018, to supplement their response
to plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff shall have until January 26, 2018, to supplement their reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 13th day of November, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court

2