Envy Gentlemen's Club v. Minot, City of
Filing
21
ORDER: Parties shall submit a status report by 2/15/2019. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Envy Gentlemen's Club,
Plaintiff,
vs.
City of Minot,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No. 1:17-cv-103
This case arises from certain zoning ordinance changes enacted by the Minot City Council
on July 7, 2008. (Doc. No. 14). In November 2010, Envy Gentlemen’s Club (“Envy”) filed suit
against the City of Minot (“Minot”) in state district court challenging the constitutionally of the
subject ordinances, as applied to it. (Doc. No. 14-2). On June 17, 2011, the state district court
granted an ex parte request for a temporary injunction enjoining enforcement of the ordinances.
(Doc. Nos. 1-1; 14-4, p. 3). On subsequent motion by Minot to lift the temporary injunction, the state
district court vacated it on September 20, 2011, concluding that Envy was unlikely to prevail on the
merits. (Doc. Nos. 1-2, 14-4, pp. 23-24). Since the preliminary injunction was vacated by the state
district court, there has been no apparent activity in the state action.
Plaintiff initiated the above entitled action in May 2017, asserting claims mirroring those it
had raised in the state action. Finding that abstention was appropriate under Younger v. Harris, 401
U.S. 746. 756 (1971), this court issued an order on July 26, 2018, granting in part the City’s motion
to dismiss and staying the above-entitled action pending further order.
Nearly six months have lapsed since the court issued its order. The parties are directed to file
a report updating the court on the status of the state action by February 15, 2019. The court shall
1
review this status report upon receipt and thereafter advise the parties how it intends to proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 16th day of January, 2019.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?