Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Tufte et al
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 30 the parties' proposed briefing schedule. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/19/2018. Defendants' combined response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/09/2018. Plaintiff's combined reply and response due by 4/9/2018. Defendants' reply due by 4/23/2018. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Pharmaceutical Care Management
Association,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Mylynn Tufte, in her official capacity as
the State Health Officer of North Dakota,
et. al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No. 1:17-cv-141
On December 18, 2017, the parties filed a “Joint Status Report and Proposed Schedule for
Briefing of Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. They advised, amongst other things, that they
do not presently anticipate a need for discovery and intend on proceeding directly with briefing on
cross-motions of summary judgment. They further propose the following briefing schedule and page
limitations:
Brief
Due Date
Page Length
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
January 19, 2018
40
Defendants’ Combined Opposition and
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
March 9, 2018
50
Plaintiff’s Combined Reply and Opposition
to Defendants’ Cross-Motion
April 9, 2018
50
Defendants’ Reply
April 23, 2018
20
The court ADOPTS the parties’ proposed briefing schedule and ORDERS that the parties file their
respective motions and briefs subject to the due dates and page lengths specified above. Should a
party later change its position with respect to discovery, it should file the appropriate motion with
1
the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 20th day of December, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?