Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Tufte et al

Filing 31

ORDER adopting 30 the parties' proposed briefing schedule. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/19/2018. Defendants' combined response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/09/2018. Plaintiff's combined reply and response due by 4/9/2018. Defendants' reply due by 4/23/2018. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, Plaintiff, vs. Mylynn Tufte, in her official capacity as the State Health Officer of North Dakota, et. al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Case No. 1:17-cv-141 On December 18, 2017, the parties filed a “Joint Status Report and Proposed Schedule for Briefing of Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. They advised, amongst other things, that they do not presently anticipate a need for discovery and intend on proceeding directly with briefing on cross-motions of summary judgment. They further propose the following briefing schedule and page limitations: Brief Due Date Page Length Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment January 19, 2018 40 Defendants’ Combined Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment March 9, 2018 50 Plaintiff’s Combined Reply and Opposition to Defendants’ Cross-Motion April 9, 2018 50 Defendants’ Reply April 23, 2018 20 The court ADOPTS the parties’ proposed briefing schedule and ORDERS that the parties file their respective motions and briefs subject to the due dates and page lengths specified above. Should a party later change its position with respect to discovery, it should file the appropriate motion with 1 the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th day of December, 2017. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?