Association of Equipment Manufacturers et al v. Burgum et al
Filing
21
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lauren Champaign; granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Benjamin R. Dryden; granting 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jarren Ginsburg; granting 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael J. Lockerby; granting 19 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Connor A. Sabatino; granting 20 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Roberta F. Howell. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Association of Equipment Manufacturers,
et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
The Hon. Doug Burgum, Governor of the
State of North Dakota, in his Official
Capacity, et. al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER RE ADMISSION
PRO HAC VICE
Case No. 1:17-cv-151
Before the court are motions for attorneys Lauren Champaign, Benjamin R. Dryden, Jarren
Ginsburg, Michael J. Lockerby, Connor A. Sabatino, and Roberta F. Howell to appear pro hac vice
on plaintiffs' behalf. In accordance with D.N.D. Gen. L.R. 1.3(D), attorneys Lauren Champaign,
Benjamin R. Dryden, Jarren Ginsburg, Michael J. Lockerby, Connor A. Sabatino, and Roberta F.
Howell have affirmed to submit to the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District
of North Dakota and to the jurisdiction of this court in matters of discipline. They have also paid
the required admission fees to the office of the Clerk. Accordingly, the motions (Docket Nos. 1520) are GRANTED. Attorneys Lauren Champaign, Benjamin R. Dryden, Jarren Ginsburg,
Michael J. Lockerby, Connor A. Sabatino, and Roberta F. Howell are admitted to practice before
this court in the above-entitled action on behalf of plaintiffs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 1st day of August, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?