Peterson v. Murex Petroleum Corporation et al

Filing 118

ORDER requiring compliance with Local Rule Re Filing of Deposition Transcripts. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Adam Peterson, Plaintiff, vs. Murex Petroleum Corporation, Mickey Peck, company man, Stokes and Spiehler, Stokes and Spiehler Onshore, Inc., Earl Britzenhoff, Company Man, and Phoenix Operating Company, Defendants, and Murex Petroleum Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. WISCO, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE RE FILING OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS Case No.1:17-cv-165 One or more of the parties have filed excerpts of deposition transcripts in support of their motions. This is in contravention of the court’s local rule D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 7.1(D)(1), which requires that copies of the complete transcripts be filed electronically in PDF format. The party or parties that have filed only excerpts must file complete copies within 2 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply may result in any motions for which the excerpts have been provided in support being summarily denied. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 25th day of March, 2019. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?