Peterson v. Murex Petroleum Corporation et al
Filing
118
ORDER requiring compliance with Local Rule Re Filing of Deposition Transcripts. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Adam Peterson,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Murex Petroleum Corporation,
Mickey Peck, company man,
Stokes and Spiehler,
Stokes and Spiehler Onshore, Inc.,
Earl Britzenhoff, Company Man, and
Phoenix Operating Company,
Defendants,
and
Murex Petroleum Corporation,
Defendant and
Third-Party Plaintiff,
vs.
WISCO, Inc.,
Third-Party Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL RULE RE FILING OF
DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS
Case No.1:17-cv-165
One or more of the parties have filed excerpts of deposition transcripts in support of their
motions. This is in contravention of the court’s local rule D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 7.1(D)(1), which
requires that copies of the complete transcripts be filed electronically in PDF format.
The party or parties that have filed only excerpts must file complete copies within 2 days of
the date of this order. Failure to comply may result in any motions for which the excerpts have been
provided in support being summarily denied.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 25th day of March, 2019.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?