Peterson v. Murex Petroleum Corporation et al

Filing 169

ORDER: The court, on its own motion, dismisses plaintiffs claims and defendants cross-claims with prejudice and without fees or costs to any of the parties. As this disposes of what remains of this case, a final judgment shall be entered reflecting a dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs claims and defendants cross-claims and dismissal without prejudice of the third-party complaint. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Adam Peterson, Plaintiff, vs. Murex Petroleum Corporation, Mickey Peck, company man, Stokes and Spiehler, Earl Britzenhoff, Company Man, and Phoenix Operating Company, Defendants, and Murex Petroleum Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. WISCO, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Case No.1:17-cv-165 In April 2019, the court was advised that a settlement had been reached with respect to plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims. On August 19, 2019, the court dismissed Murex Petroleum Corporation’s third-party claim against WISCO, INC. without prejudice. As closing documents with respective to plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims have yet to be submitted, see D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 41.1, the court, on its own motion, DISMISSES plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims with prejudice and without fees or costs to any of the parties. As this disposes of what remains of this case, a final judgment shall be entered reflecting 1 a dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims and dismissal without prejudice of the third-party complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 3rd day of September, 2019. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?