Peterson v. Murex Petroleum Corporation et al
Filing
169
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, dismisses plaintiffs claims and defendants cross-claims with prejudice and without fees or costs to any of the parties. As this disposes of what remains of this case, a final judgment shall be entered reflecting a dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs claims and defendants cross-claims and dismissal without prejudice of the third-party complaint. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Adam Peterson,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Murex Petroleum Corporation,
Mickey Peck, company man,
Stokes and Spiehler,
Earl Britzenhoff, Company Man, and
Phoenix Operating Company,
Defendants,
and
Murex Petroleum Corporation,
Defendant and
Third-Party Plaintiff,
vs.
WISCO, Inc.,
Third-Party Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No.1:17-cv-165
In April 2019, the court was advised that a settlement had been reached with respect to
plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims. On August 19, 2019, the court dismissed Murex
Petroleum Corporation’s third-party claim against WISCO, INC. without prejudice.
As closing documents with respective to plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims have
yet to be submitted, see D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 41.1, the court, on its own motion, DISMISSES
plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims with prejudice and without fees or costs to any of the
parties. As this disposes of what remains of this case, a final judgment shall be entered reflecting
1
a dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ cross-claims and dismissal without
prejudice of the third-party complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 3rd day of September, 2019.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?