Slawson Exploration Company, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior et al
Filing
9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Robert S. Thompson, III; granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Daniel R. McElroy II; granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Eric R. Olson; granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kathleen C. Schroder; granting 8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Timothy R. Canon, II. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorneys McElroy, Olson, Schroder and Canon on 8/14/2017 (cjs).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Slawson Exploration Company, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
United States Department of the Interior;
et. al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER RE ADMISSION
PRO HAC VICE
Case No. 1:17-cv-166
Before the court are motions for attorneys Robert S. Thompson, III, Daniel R. McElroy, Eric
R. Olson, Kathleen C. Schroder, and Timothy R. Canon, II to appear pro hac vice on plaintiff's
behalf. In accordance with D.N.D. Gen. L.R. 1.3(D), attorneys Robert S. Thompson, III, Daniel
R. McElroy, Eric R. Olson, Kathleen C. Schroder, and Timothy R. Canon, II have affirmed to
submit to the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota and
to the jurisdiction of this court in matters of discipline. They have also paid the required admission
fees to the office of the Clerk. Accordingly, the motions (Docket No. 4-8 ) are GRANTED.
Attorneys Robert S. Thompson, III, Daniel R. McElroy, Eric R. Olson, Kathleen C. Schroder, and
Timothy R. Canon, II are admitted to practice before this court in the above-entitled action on behalf
of plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 14th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?