Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Riverdale High Lodge

Filing 12

ORDER: If it has not already done so, respondent shall produce the requested documents by 7/6/2018. The 1 Application for an Order to Show Cause is administratively termed. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner, vs. Riverdale High Lodge, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Case No. 1:18-mc-003 On April 25, 2018, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed an “Application for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should not Be Enforced.” Upon review and consideration of the EEOC’s application and supporting memorandum, the court ordered respondent to show cause why it should not be required to comply with Amended Subpoena No. CHMN-A18-5 issued by the EEOC. On June 1, 2018, respondent filed a response to the court’s order to show cause, advising that it would produce the requested documents to the best of its ability by June 15, 2018. If it has not already done so, respondent shall produce the requested documents by July 6, 2018. This matter shall be deemed closed and the EEOC’s application (Doc. No. 1) shall be administratively termed. Should the EEOC take further issue with respondent’s response to its subpoena(s), it may file an application for whatever relief its believes it is entitled. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 25th day of June, 2018. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?