Marick v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(AH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION Kimberly Marick Petitioner, vs. Michael J. Astrue, Social Security Administration Commissioner, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Civil File No. 2:09-cv-19 Before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both parties (Docs. #11, #16). Plaintiff Marick initiated this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33. The Court has received a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #19) from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED. No party has filed an objection to this recommendation within the requisite time period pursuant to Rule 72(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and District of North Dakota Local Court Rule 72.1(D)(3). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, along with the entire file, and finds that the Magistrate Judge's position is correct. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED, and the Commissioner's decision is hereby AFFIRMED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 22nd day of March, 2010. /s/ Ralph R. Erickson Ralph R. Erickson, Chief District Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?