Daucsavage v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson. (AH)

Download PDF
Daucsavage v. Social Security Administration Commissioner Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION Leonard Daucsavage, Plaintiff, vs. Michael J. Astrue, Social Security Administration Commissioner, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Civil File No. 3:09-cv-59 Before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both parties, or in the alternative, Plaintiff has moved for remand for additional administrative proceedings. (Docs. #13, #16). Plaintiff initiated this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33, and for denying her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-83(c). (Tr. 14-27). The Court has received a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #19) from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. No party has filed an objection to this recommendation within the requisite time period pursuant to Rule 72(a) and (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and District of North Dakota Local Court Rule 72.1(d)(2) and (3). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, along with the entire file, and finds that the Magistrate Judge's position is correct. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Dockets.Justia.com Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 20th day of July, 2010. /s/ Ralph R. Erickson Ralph R. Erickson, Chief District Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?