Dean v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson. Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, and 19 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.(SH) Modified on 8/26/2011 to correct docket text referencing parties' motions as Plaintiff's motion at 14 (denied), and Defendant's motion at 19 (granted); NEF regenerated (lh).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION Rebecca A. Dean, Plaintiff, -vsSocial Security Administration Commissioner, Michael J. Astrue, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:10-cv-38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff sought judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits. The Court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed (Doc. #22). Neither party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. After carefully reviewing the Report and Recommendation, along with the entire file, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons set forth therein, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, motion to remand (Doc. #14) is hereby DENIED; Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. #19) is hereby GRANTED; and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 26th day of August, 2011. /s/ Ralph R. Erickson Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?