Ireland et al v. Olson et al

Filing 518

ORDER ADOPTING 394 and 399 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and granting in part and denying in part 343 Motion to Certify Class by Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Rodney J. Ireland, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:13-cv-03 -vs- ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #394) Maggie D. Anderson, Executive Director, North Dakota Department of Human Services, in her official capacity, et al., Defendants. On August 29, 2016, the court received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending denial of class certification as to one proposed class and granting class certification as to the other proposed classes and subclasses.1 In addition, the court received a supplement to the Report and Recommendation.2 The defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, asserting that the plaintiffs cannot satisfy the requirements of Fed.R.Civ. P. 23.3 The defendants further contend that certification of the small classes is unnecessary because the relief requested, if successful, will be identical regardless of whether or not a class action is maintained. The plaintiffs filed a response to the objections.4 A de novo review of the record and applicable case law demonstrates that class 1 Doc. #394. 2 Doc. #399. 3 Doc. #401. 4 Doc. #406. 1 certification is appropriate. The court hereby adopts the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court finds that the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 have been met as to the SOTEP Class and subclasses, the Evaluation Class, and the Debt Class. The law firms of Brancart & Brancart and the Fremstad Law Firm are appointed as class counsel for the classes and subclasses. The plaintiffs’ proposed individuals are appointed as representatives of the classes and subclasses, with the addition of Garrett Loy as an additional representative of the Evaluation Class. The claims of the classes and subclasses are preliminarily defined to those set forth in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. The plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed DOCR class is denied. The plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 21st day of March, 2017. /s/ Ralph R. Erickson Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?