Jackson v. Bertcsh et al

Filing 45

ORDER 44 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 37 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and dismissing complaint without prejudice by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION Roger Jerome Jackson, N.A C.G. = Native right[]s, Case No. 3:14-cv-14 Plaintiff, -vs- ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Leann Bert[sc]h, DOCR Director, Don Redmann, Warden, and Mark Haines, Chaplain, Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that the court grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss and that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice because Jackson failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.1 Jackson has not objected to the Report and Recommendation within the prescribed time period. After reviewing the record and considering the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court finds the magistrate judge’s analysis of the claims and recommendations for disposition are appropriate. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons stated therein, the defendants’ motion to dismiss2 is GRANTED and Jackson’s complaint3 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 1 Doc. #44. 2 Doc. #37. 3 Doc. #5. 1 The court finds that any appeal would be frivolous, cannot be taken in good faith, and may not be taken in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 4th day of June, 2015. /s/ Ralph R. Erickson Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?