Corman v. Schweitzer et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 21 Motion for Protective Order; and denying 21 Motion for Restraining Order by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Ryan Ray Corman,
.
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:14-cv-33
-vsORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Alex Schweitzer, Kerry Wicks, Larry
Culp, and NDSH Clinical Team,
Defendants.
Ryan Ray Corman,
Case No. 3:14-cv-55
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
-vsShawn Lee, DCS, NDSH, Cathy Last
Name Concealed DCA3, NDSH, Dale
Last Name Concealed DCA3, NDSH,
and NDSH Clinical Team of May 16,
2014, Secure #2,
Defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and
Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate
Judge, in each of the above-captioned cases.1 The Report and Recommendation
recommends that Plaintiff Ryan Ray Corman’s motions seeking injunctive relief be
1
Doc. #23, Case No. 3:14-cv-33; Doc. #22, Case No. 3:14-cv-55
1
denied, as he is no longer confined at the North Dakota State Hospital and has not
demonstrated that he is likely to suffer any future injury at the facility that could be
remedied through injunctive relief against any North Dakota State Hospital employee.
Corman has not filed objections within the prescribed time period.
After considering the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and also
reviewing the record, the court finds the magistrate judge’s analysis and
recommendation is appropriate. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the Report and
Recommendation filed in each of these cases. Corman’s motions seeking injunctive
relief2 in each of these cases are hereby DENIED in their entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 18th day of March, 2015.
/s/ Ralph R. Erickson
Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Doc. #21, Case No. 3:14-cv-33; Docs. #6 & #16, Case No. 3:14-cv-55.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?