Corman v. Schweitzer et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 21 Motion for Protective Order; and denying 21 Motion for Restraining Order by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION Ryan Ray Corman, . Plaintiff, Case No. 3:14-cv-33 -vsORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Alex Schweitzer, Kerry Wicks, Larry Culp, and NDSH Clinical Team, Defendants. Ryan Ray Corman, Case No. 3:14-cv-55 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -vsShawn Lee, DCS, NDSH, Cathy Last Name Concealed DCA3, NDSH, Dale Last Name Concealed DCA3, NDSH, and NDSH Clinical Team of May 16, 2014, Secure #2, Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge, in each of the above-captioned cases.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that Plaintiff Ryan Ray Corman’s motions seeking injunctive relief be 1 Doc. #23, Case No. 3:14-cv-33; Doc. #22, Case No. 3:14-cv-55 1 denied, as he is no longer confined at the North Dakota State Hospital and has not demonstrated that he is likely to suffer any future injury at the facility that could be remedied through injunctive relief against any North Dakota State Hospital employee. Corman has not filed objections within the prescribed time period. After considering the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and also reviewing the record, the court finds the magistrate judge’s analysis and recommendation is appropriate. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation filed in each of these cases. Corman’s motions seeking injunctive relief2 in each of these cases are hereby DENIED in their entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 18th day of March, 2015. /s/ Ralph R. Erickson Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge United States District Court 2 Doc. #21, Case No. 3:14-cv-33; Docs. #6 & #16, Case No. 3:14-cv-55. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?