Smuda v. Anderson et al
ORDER ADOPTING 88 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 86 Motion for Default Judgment by Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Richard Allen Smuda,
Case No. 3:16-cv-335
-vsORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
Leann Bertsch, Director, North Dakota
Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, in her official capacity,
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation
from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge.1 The Report and
Recommendation recommends that the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be denied.
The plaintiff has objected to the Report and Recommendation, asserting that it is important
to have the defendants correctly named in the caption and use of Maggie Anderson as a
defendant in the caption of the defendants’ answer is illegal.2
The court finds the recommendation in the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation is appropriate. The clerical error in the caption noted by the plaintiff is
not a basis for granting default judgment as requested by the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s
motion for default judgment3 is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 20th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Ralph R. Erickson
Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?