Kartch et al v. EOG Resources, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 36 Motion for Revised Scheduling Order. (BG)

Download PDF
-CSM Kartch et al v. EOG Resources, Inc. Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION Frankie and Kristin Kartch, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ) REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER vs. ) ) EOG Resources, Inc., ) ) Case No. 4:10-cv-014 Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ On March 24, 2011, the parties filed a Motion for Revised Scheduling Order. Attached to the motion was a stipulated scheduling/Discovery Plan and Order. The court GRANTS the parties' motion (Doc. No. 36). The court's previous scheduling order shall be amended as follows: 1. The parties shall ave until July 22, 2011, to complete fact discovery and to file discovery motion s relating to factual discovery. 2. The parties shall have until June 1, 2011, to move to amend their pleadings to add claims or defenses, except for claims for punitive damages, for which the deadline is August 1, 2011. 3. The plaintiffs have until July 15, 2011, to provide the names of expert witnesses and the subject matter of their testimony. 4. The plaintiffs shall have until August 1, 2011, to provide expert reports or disclosures as required under Rule 26(a)(2). 5. The defendants shall have until September 15, 2011, to provide the names of experts and their reports or disclosures as required under Rule 26(a)(2). 6. The parties shall have until November 1, 2011, to complete expert discovery and to 1 Dockets.Justia.com file discovery motions relating to expert discovery. 7. The parties shall have until November 7, 2011, to file dispositive motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 25th day of March, 2011. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?