Goheen v. BNSF Railway Company
Filing
21
ORDER adopting the parties' 20 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling/Discovery Plan. Discovery due by 11/22/2012. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 11/15/2012. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 12/30/2012. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Ramona Goheen,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BNSF Railway Company, a
Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No. 4:11-cv-021
On May 29, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation to Modify Scheduling/Discovery Plan and
Continue Trial Date. The court ADOPTS the parties’ stipulation (Docket No. 20). The court’s
scheduling order shall be amended as follows:
3.
The parties shall have until November 22, 2012, to complete fact discovery and to
file discovery motions.
4.
The parties shall provide the names of expert witnesses and complete reports
under Rule 26(a)(2) as follows: The plaintiff shall have until November 15, 2012,
to serve expert witness disclosures complaint with the language of Rule 26(a)(2),
and the defendant shall have until December 30, 2012, to serve to serve expert
witness disclosures complaint with the language of Rule 26(a)(2). (Treating
physicians need not prepare reports, only qualifications, unless they will express
opinions not reflected in the medical records.) (Reports to be served on other
parties, but not filed with the court.)
5.
The parties shall have until February 28, 2013, to complete discovery depositions
1
of expert witnesses.
The court shall contact the parties to schedule a conference call to discuss an extension of
the dispositive motion deadline and a continuance of trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 30th day of May, 2012.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?