Williston Hunter ND, LLC et al v. Eagle Operating, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER: Parties are to submit a status report to the court by 3/31/2014. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION Williston Hunter ND, LLC and Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, vs. Eagle Operating, Inc., Defendants. Eagle Operating, Inc., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant vs. Williston Hunter ND, LLC and Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, Defendants and Counter-Claimants. Case No. 4:11-cv-066 Case No. 4:11-cv-067 On September 12, 2011, Eagle Operating filed a “Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative Stay Pending Completion of Arbitration” in Williston Hunter ND, LLC v. Eagle Operating, Inc., Case No. 4:11-cv-066. See Docket No. 6. On October 4, 2011, Eagle Operating filed a “Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative Stay Counterclaims Pending Completion of Arbitration” in Eagle Operating, Inc. v. Williston Hunter ND, LLC, Case No. 4:11-cv-067. See Docket No. 4. On January 1, 2012, the court granted Eagle Operating’s motions (Case No. 4:11-cv-066, Docket No. 6; Case No. 4:11-cv-067, Docket No. 4), ordered the parties into arbitration to resolve 1 all disputes related to any disputed amounts, cost adjustments to the cash consideration, or any other disputes as to the interpretation of the agreement, and stayed claims and counterclaims asserted Williston Hunter ND, LLC and Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (Case No. 4:11-cv-066, Docket No. 1; Case No. 4:11-cv-067, Docket No. 3) pending the completion of arbitration. The parties are directed to file a report with the court by March 31, 2014, updating it on the status of their arbitration. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 17th day of March, 2014. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?