Braasch v. BNSF Railway Company

Filing 39

ORDER denying plaintiff's oral motion to compel defendant to supplement or otherwise respond to certain discovery requests. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Dean Braasch,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BNSF Railway Company, a
corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

Case No. 4:12-cv-015

At plaintiff’s request, the court held status conference via telephone on June 17, 2013, to
address a discovery dispute amongst the parties. Plaintiffs made a motion on the record for the court
to order defendants to supplement or otherwise respond to certain discovery requests as described
in a letter submitted to the court prior to the conference. Defendant objected to plaintiff’s request
on the grounds that it was untimely. The court agrees with defendant and finds plaintiff’s request
untimely. Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff’s request. The Clerk’s office has attached to
the minutes of the status conference a copy of plaintiff’s letter to the court to describing the basis
for his request.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 17th day of June, 2013.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court