North Prairie Rural Water District v. Surrey, City of et al

Filing 20

ORDER: Plaintiff shall have until 6/07/2013 to file an Amended Complaint. Defendants shall have until 6/21/2013 to file an answer or otherwise respond. The court will defer consideration of plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction unless and until plaintiff renews its request for hearing. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
North Prairie Rural Water District,
Plaintiff,
vs.
City of Surrey and Silver Springs
Development Inc.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

Case No. 4:12-cv-165

On May 23, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation to indefinitely extend defendants’ deadline
for responding to plaintiff’s Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction. That same day the
court held a status conference in this action. Attorneys Robert Hoy and Sara Nyhus-Wear appeared
on plaintiff’s behalf. Attorneys Bryan Van Grinsven and Debra Hoffarth appeared on behalf of
Defendant City of Surrey. Pursuant to the parties’ discussions, the court ORDERS:
1.

Plaintiff shall have until June 7, 2013, to file an Amended Complaint; and

2.

Defendants shall have until June 21, 2013, to file an answer or otherwise respond to
plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.

The court will defer consideration of plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction unless and until
plaintiff contacts the court to request a hearing, at which time the court will afford defendants an
opportunity to file a response to the motion. If Defendant Silver Springs Development, Inc. is
represented by counsel, it should so advise the court and file an answer if it intends to contest this
matter.
Dated this 23rd day of May, 2013.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge