Knight v. Vondal

Filing 35

ORDER: Plaintiff's response to defendant's 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction due by 10/24/2014. Defendant's reply due by 10/31/2014. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION Richard Knight, Plaintiff, vs. Darren Vondall, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Case No. 4:13-cv-004 The court on its own motion orders that plaintiff shall have until October 24, 2014, to file a response to defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss.” Failure to file response may be deemed an admission that the motion is well taken and subject the motion to summary ruling. D.N.D. Civ. L.R. 71(F). Defendant shall have until October 31, 2014, to file a reply. In the interim, the parties should contact the court should they have a mutual interest in exploring settlement and want the undersigned’s assistance. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 3rd day of October, 2014. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?