Burckhard et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Filing
30
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 28 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney John L. Wright; granting 29 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney James R. Halverson. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorneys on 7/26/2013. (rm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Corrie Burkhard, as Personal
Representative for the Estate of Todd
Burckhard, Decedent, and Maria Mack,
as Personal Representative for the Estate of
Blaine H. Mack, Decedent,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BNSF Railway Company, a Delaware
)
corporation, and CUSA ES, LLC d/b/a
)
Coach America Crew Transport,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
)
CUSA ES, LLC, db/a Coach America
)
Crew Transport,
)
)
Third-Party Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Ronald Keiser and QBE Insurance
)
Corporation,
)
)
Third-Party Defendants.
)
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
Case No. 4:13-cv-038
Before the court is are motions for attorneys John L. Wright and James R. Halverson to
appear pro hac vice on behalf of Third-Party Defendant Ronald Keiser. In accordance with D.N.D.
Gen. L.R. 1.3(D), attorneys Wright and Halverson have affirmed to submit to the Local Rules of
the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota and to the jurisdiction of this court
in matters of discipline. They have also paid the required admission fees to the office of the Clerk.
1
Accordingly, the motions (Docket No. 28 and 29) are GRANTED. Attorney John L. Wright and
James R. Halverson are admitted to practice before this court in the above-entitled action on behalf
of Third-Party Defendant Ronald Keiser.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 26th day of July, 2013.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?