Simmons v. RPC Inc. et al
Filing
13
ORDER for expedited response from plaintiff to 11 MOTION Leave to Serve Subpoena Duces Tecum. Plaintiff's response due by 8/08/2014. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Robert Todd Simmons,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RPC Inc.; Cudd Energy Services, Inc.;
Cudd Well Control, Inc.; EPI Consultants;
Murex Petroleum Corporation; and SpecTech Threading, Inc.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No. 4:14-cv-082
Plaintiff initiated the above-captioned personal injury action in state district court.
Defendants filed a Notice of Removal with this court on July 27, 2014. Three days later, on July
30, 2013, defendants RPC Inc., Cudd Energy Services, Inc., Cudd Well Control, Inc., and EP
Consultants filed a “Motion for Leave of Court to Serve a Supoena Duces Tecum on [Plaintiff’s]
Former Employer, WISCO, Inc.” They acknowledge that the parties have yet to confer regarding
discovery. They nevertheless seek leave of court to subpoena documents and materials from
WISCO, Inc., a non-party, averring that early access to these documents and materials is crucial and
will help all of the parties gain a better understanding of the matter in dispute.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1) provides in relevant part that, absent a stipulation or court order,
“[a] party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have conferred as required by
Rule 26(f).” To expedite consideration of defendants’ subpoena request, the court is inclined to
dispense with the fourteen days afforded by D.N.D. Civ. L.R. 7.1(B) to file a response and direct
plaintiff to respond within the week. Such an abbreviated deadline poses no appreciable prejudice
to plaintiff as the subpoena request is relatively straight forward and should not require a lengthy
1
response. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that plaintiff file a response to the motion by August
8, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 4th day of August, 2014.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?