Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. Burr et al

Filing 25

ORDER Staying Case and Setting Status Conference: Status Conference set for 9/10/2015 at 10:00 AM CDT by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Jolene Burr, Ted Lone Fight, Georgianna ) Danks, Edward S. Danks, and Judge Diane ) Johnson, in her capacity as the Chief Judge ) of the Fort Berthold District Court, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER STAYING CASE AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE Case No. 4:14-cv-085 On May 4, 2015, the court held a telephone conference in the above-captioned case. Michael J. Abrams appeared on plaintiff’s behalf. Reed Alan Soderstrom appeared on behalf of defendants Jolene Burr, Ted Lone Fight, Georgianna Danks, and Edward S. Danks. The parties agreed that rather than proceeding with the scheduling conference as scheduled, it would be appropriate to stay the case pending further action by the tribal court. Accordingly, the court ORDERS the above-captioned case STAYED pending further order of the court. The court will hold a telephonic status conference on September 10, 2015 at 10:00 AM CDT. The parties shall call the following number and enter the access code at that time: Number: 1-877-848-7030 Access Code: 9768929 The status conference will be held in conjunction with a status conference in a related case, EOG Resources, Inc. v. Johnson, Case No. 4:14-cr-087. If the parties believe action should be taken before September 10, 2015, they shall contact the undersigned’s chambers to request that an 1 appropriate hearing be set. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 4th day of May, 2015. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?