NHH Investor Group v. DFH Watford, LLC et al
Filing
67
ORDER: LLCs named as parties in this action shall disclose the citizenship of their respective members by March 21, 2016. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG) Distributed on 3/3/2016 (jt).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
NHH Investor Group, a Utah DBA, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
DFH Watford, LLC, a foreign limited
liability company, et. al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Case No. 4:15-cv-027
This order is issued to permit the court to obtain the information necessary to determine
whether diversity jurisdiction exists in this case. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.
James Neff Kramper Family Farm P’ship v. IBP, Inc., 393 F.3d 828, 834 (8th Cir. 2005). Subject
matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, and if it appears that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking, the
court is obligated to consider the issue sua sponte. Id.; see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) (“If the court
determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.”)
In their second amended complaint, plaintiffs asserts that this court has diversity jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 over their claims against defendants. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a),
federal district courts have subject matter jurisdiction over civil actions between parties with
complete diversity of citizenship where the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Complete
diversity exists when no defendant is a citizen of the same state as any plaintiff. OnePoint Solutions,
LLC v. Borchert, 486 F.3d 342, 346 (8th Cir. 2007). For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited
liability company’s citizenship is determined by the citizenship of each of its members. GMAC
Commercial Credit LLC v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827, 828-29 (8th Cir. 2004).
Whether diversity exists is determined by the parties’ citizenship at the time of filing. Scottsdale
Ins. Co. v. Universal Crop Prot. Alliance, LLC, 620 F.3d 926, 931 (8th Cir. 2010) (citing Grupo
Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L.P., 541 U.S. 567, 570-71 (2004)).
The court cannot at this point determine the citizenship of the LLCs that are parties to this
action from the record. Consequently, in order to definitively determine whether there is complete
diversity of citizenship between the parties, the court shall require the LLCs named as parties in this
action to disclose the citizenship of their respective members by March 21, 2016.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 3rd day of March, 2016.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
1
To date no one has entered an appearance or filed a responsive pleading on behalf of Defendants New
Harmony Development, LLC or New Harmony Homes & QB, LLC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?