Ocean Innovations, Inc. et al v. Quarterberth, Inc. et al

Filing 450

Order of partial dismissal. Jet Dock's motion is granted, all claims against Dabrowski are dismissed without prejudice except claims 1, 15, and 28 as stated in the order. Judge John R. Adams on 7/12/11. (K,C)

Download PDF
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OCEAN INNOVATIONS, INC. (f/k/a JET DOCK LICENSING, INC.), et al. Plaintiffs, v. QUARTERBERTH, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1-03-CV0913 JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The plaintiffs, Ocean Innovations, Inc., and Jet Dock Systems Inc. (collectively "Jet Dock") have moved voluntarily to dismiss without prejudice all claims against George Dabrowski ("Dabrowski") except their claim that he infringed claims 1 and 15 of U.S. Patent 5,529,013 and claim 28 of U.S. Patent 5,931,113. Jet Dock has also moved to waive its claim for damages for infringement of claims 1 and 15 of U.S. Patent 5,529,013 and claim 28 of U.S. Patent 5,931,113. The Court has previously held on summary judgment that Dabrowski had not shown these claims to be invalid (ECF 238) and that he has infringed these claims (ECF 243). Dabrowski filed an answer to the complaint (ECF 23) which raised no counterclaim against Jet Dock. Dabrowski did not file an answer to the Supplemental and Second Amended Complaint (ECF 209). In view of the foregoing, Jet Dock's motion is granted and all claims in Jet Dock's Supplemental and Second Amended Complaint against Dabrowski except the claims that Dabrowski infringed claims 1 and 15 of U.S. Patent 5,529,013 and claim 28 of U.S. Patent 5,931,113 are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED 7/12/2011 _____________________________ /s/ John R. Adams ________________________ Date John R. Adams U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?