Boehm v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 4

First Motion for extension of time until May 29, 2007 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by all defendants. (Cabral, Thomas)

Download PDF
Boehm v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al Doc. 4 Case 1:07-cv-01018-PCE Document 4 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1 82976-116259 TJC 4/27/07 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA SE NO: 1:07CV1018 J U DG E: PETER C. ECONOMUS Gregory Boehm P l a i n t if f v. M enu Foods, Inc., et al. Defendants D EFEN D A N T,`s, STIPULATION FOR EXTEN SIO N OF TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT We, the attorneys for the respective parties, do hereby stipulate that the Defendants, Menu Foods, Inc., Menu Foods Genpar Limited aka Menu Foods Limited, and Menu Foods Income Fund may answer the Complaint on or before May 29, 2007 and that the Court may enter an order accordingly, notice by the clerk has been waived. s/ John T. Murray (#0008793) 111 East Shoreline Drive P.O. Box 19 Sandusky, Ohio 44870 (419) 624-3000 A ttorney for Plaintiff Gregory Boehm s/ Thomas J. Cabral (0033041) IT IS SO ORDERED: _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ JU D G E G allag her, Sharp Attorneys. Sixth Floor, Bulkley Building 1501 Euclid Avenue (216) 241-5310 A ttorn ey for Defendants Menu Foods Inc. Menu Foods Genpar Limited Menu Foods Income Fund Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?