Scruggs v. Gansheimer
Order of Transfer. The Court finds that transfer is appropriate in this case. Accordingly, this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Cincinnati). Signed by Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 7/2/2007.(H,CM)
Scruggs v. Gansheimer
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
HENRY S. SCRUGGS, Petitioner, v. RICH GANSHEIMER, Respondent.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 1:07 CV 1820 JUDGE KATHLEEN M. O'MALLEY ORDER OF TRANSFER
Petitioner pro se Henry S. Scruggs, an inmate in state custody at the Lake Erie Correctional Institution (LECI) in
Conneaut, Ohio, brings this action for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the judgment of conviction entered by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. Hamilton County is LECI is located Because
within Ohio's southern federal judicial district. within Ohio's northern federal judicial
petitioner challenges the conviction of a state court within the Southern District of Ohio, but is in custody in the Northern District of Ohio, both districts have concurrent jurisdiction over the action. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).
This court has the discretion to transfer this action to
Page 2 of 2
the Southern District for hearing and determination.
transfer to the Southern District is appropriate in this case, because it is the more convenient forum and the evidence is more readily accessible in the district where petitioner was convicted. See, Bell v. Watkins, 692 F.2d 999, 1013 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 843 (1983); see also, Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 497 n.13 (1973). Accordingly, this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Cincinnati). IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Kathleen M. O'Malley KATHLEEN M. O'MALLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: July 2, 2007
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?