Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 11

Report and Recommended Decision. The parties have stipulated to remand of this action pursuant to the sixth sentence of 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). It is recommended that the stipulation be approved. Objections to R&R due by 7/7/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 6/23/08. (W,Jo)

Download PDF
Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Earnest Napier, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:07CV3170 Judge Patricia Gaughan Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION The parties have stipulated to remand of this action pursuant to the sixth sentence of §205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405(g). It is recommended that the stipulation be approved. s/DAVID S. PERELMAN United States Magistrate Judge DATE: June 23, 2008 OBJECTIONS Any objections to this Report and Recommended Decision must be filed with the Clerk of Courts within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. See, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See, also, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986). Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?