Webb et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 88

Order. The Court finds that the need for a briefing schedule is moot since the parties have filed and fully briefed the qualified immunity issues (Related Doc # 57 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/11/09.(M,M)

Webb et al v. United States of America et al

Doc. 88

Case 1:07-cv-03290-CAB Document 88

Filed 09/11/09 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOSHAWA WEBB, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants. CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J: This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Joint Motion for Establishment of a Briefing Schedule for Submission of Summary Judgment Motions Directed to the Issue of Qualified Immunity and for a Stay of Discovery Pending Resolution of Such Motions (ECF #57). The Court finds that the need for a briefing schedule is moot since the parties have filed and fully briefed the qualified immunity issues. The Court will grant the motion to stay the discovery but will consider the need for discovery as argued in Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' motions for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. IT IS SO ORDERED. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.1:07CV3290 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

ORDER

S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO United States District Judge September 11, 2009

Dockets.Justia.com