Webb et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 90

Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion to File an Amended Rule 56(f) affidavit in Response to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Related Doc # 82 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/29/09.(M,M)

Webb et al v. United States of America et al

Doc. 90

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

JOSHAWA WEBB, ET AL., Plaintiff, Vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J:

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.1:07CV3290 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to File an Amended Rule 56(f) affidavit in Response to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF#82). Plaintiffs seek to add, as the basis for further discovery, the indictment of Defendant Lee Lucas and the guilty plea of Defendant Metcalf in a companion case. Because the Motion was filed months after the briefing had been completed, because Plaintiffs did not file a Brief in Opposition to Defendant Lee Lucas' Motion for Summary Judgment and because Metcalf's guilty plea in another proceeding arising from different facts is not relevant to the issues before this Court, Plaintiffs' Motion is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO United States District Judge September 29, 2009

Dockets.Justia.com