Citizens Bank v. Cinema Park, LLC et al

Filing 119

Report and Recommendation that the motions to dismiss defendants Cleveland Lighting Center, Ltd. (Related Doc # 111 ), Unleash Construction (Related Doc # 112 ), and N.B. Construction, Inc. (Related Doc # 110 ) be granted. Objections to R&R due by 3/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 02/17/2009. (G,GS)

Download PDF
Citizens Bank v. Cinema Park, LLC et al Doc. 119 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CITIZENS BANK, Plaintiff, v. CINEMA PARK L.L.C., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:08 CV 2174 JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM H. BAUGHMAN, JR. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION This case comes before me on consent of the plaintiff, Citizens Bank, and certain but not all of the defendants joined in the complaint.1 Until all defendants have consented to my jurisdiction, or those who have not so consented have been removed from the case by order of the District Judge, this case must proceed as on referral. Citizens Bank has moved to dismiss three defendants as having disclaimed any right, title, or interest in the property in dispute in this case ­ Cleveland Lighting Center, Ltd.;2 Unleash Construction;3 and N.B. Construction, Inc.4 On consideration whereof, I hereby recommend that the motions to dismiss the above identified defendants be granted. Dated: February 17, 2009 s/ William H. Baughman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 ECF # 87. ECF # 111. ECF # 112. ECF # 110. Dockets.Justia.com Objections Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Courts within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order.5 See, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See also, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986). 5 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?