Citizens Bank v. Cinema Park, LLC et al

Filing 211

Report and Recommendation that the pending motion for default judgment be granted and that the Court enter judgment on Graves Lumber's motion in the form set forth in the proposed judgment entry attached to Graves Lumber's motion (Related Doc # 206 , 207 ). Objections to R&R due by 5/12/2010. Signed Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. on 04/28/2010. (G,GS)

Citizens Bank v. Cinema Park, LLC et al

Doc. 211

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CITIZENS BANK, Plaintiff, v. CINEMA PARK L.L.C., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:08 CV 2174 JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM H. BAUGHMAN, JR. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In this real property foreclosure action, the plaintiff and all defendants who have filed answers have consented to magistrate judge's jurisdiction.1 Defendant Cinema Park L.L.C. has defaulted on a crossclaim filed by defendant Graves Lumber Co. A notice of default has now issued.2 Graves Lumber has filed a motion for default judgment.3 The affidavit of Graves Lumber's Vice President, Walt Minick, sets forth the sum certain by computation owed by Cinema Park to Graves Lumber.4 On consideration whereof, I hereby recommend that the pending motion for default judgment be granted and that the Court enter judgment on Graves Lumber's motion in the form set forth in the proposed judgment entry attached to Graves Lumber's motion.5
1 2 3 4 5

ECF #s 87, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150. ECF # 206. ECF # 207. ECF # 207, Exhibit A. ECF # 207-2.

Dockets.Justia.com

With the entry of this judgment, the Magistrate Judge will exercise consent jurisdiction over the remaining claims and parties. Dated: April 28, 2010 s/ William H. Baughman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge Objections Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Courts within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order.6

See, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See also, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986).

6

-2-