Jerdine v. Bennett et al
Filing
4
Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing petition. The court certifies, pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Lesley Wells (C,KA)
Jerdine v. Bennett et al
Doc. 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ANTHONY JERDINE, v. Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10 CV 522
MARK S. BENNETT, et al., Respondents. ________________________________
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LESLEY WELLS On March 11, 2010, petitioner pro se Anthony Jerdine filed the above-captioned habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Mr. Jerdine appears to seek to challenge this court's jurisdiction in a pending criminal proceeding in which he is a defendant. Any such challenge, however, must be raised in that case. See United States v. Anthony L. Jerdine, 8 CR 481. Accordingly, the petition is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Lesley Wells UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: 6 April 2010
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?